Skip to content

Link file for air, cont. after squash branch from main #737

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 19 commits into from
May 26, 2025

Conversation

InfiniteEchoes
Copy link
Collaborator

@InfiniteEchoes InfiniteEchoes commented May 19, 2025

Following #728 , #736 , for #731 .

  • Added of_value for columns
  • Compiled blake3_air::air

@InfiniteEchoes InfiniteEchoes mentioned this pull request May 21, 2025
instances for arrays of them(?)
Is there some way to avoid this, since this will cause much inconvenience when other
types are calling this? *)
Record t {T U : Set} `{Link T} `{Link U} : Set := {
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggested change
Record t {T U : Set} `{Link T} `{Link U} : Set := {
Record t {T U : Set} : Set := {

Actually I think we can avoid the Link parameters for the definition of the type and add it only when necessary, what simplifies our definitions later.

Copy link
Collaborator Author

@InfiniteEchoes InfiniteEchoes May 26, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actually I think we can avoid the Link parameters for the definition of the type and add it only when necessary, what simplifies our definitions later.

As mentioned in the note above, the problem here is I cannot remove the link parameters, or otherwise there will be missing link instances to pass the compiler check. I was also wondering if we can have a better way to handle this...

Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

OK yes I have not seen that the references require this!

@InfiniteEchoes InfiniteEchoes merged commit ea367b9 into main May 26, 2025
1 check passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants